Scenario

The Harris family live in a large UK city. The household consists of Sam and Jordan, who are both in their late 30s, and their two children aged 10 and 13. Both parents work full-time in professional jobs, although their working hours are flexible and often extend into evenings through remote working. Household tasks such as cooking, cleaning and childcare are shared more equally than in previous generations, but both parents admit that this balance has had to be actively negotiated. Their relationship reflects wider social changes in family life, where roles are less likely to be fixed by tradition and more likely to be shaped by discussion, choice and personal circumstances.

Sam’s parents had a much more traditional family structure. Sam’s father worked full-time, while Sam’s mother stayed at home to care for the children and manage the household. In contrast, Sam and Jordan see their relationship as a partnership based on communication, equality and personal fulfilment. They discuss decisions such as finances, discipline, household tasks and future plans together. This reflects the idea of the symmetrical family, where men and women share responsibilities more equally, at least compared with the past.

At the same time, Sam sometimes feels that equality in theory does not always mean equality in practice. Even though both partners work, Sam often ends up doing more of the organising of childcare, remembering school deadlines, booking appointments and managing everyday routines alongside paid work and housework. This reflects feminist ideas about the dual burden, where women may carry both paid employment and unpaid domestic labour, and the triple shift, where they may also carry emotional work such as managing relationships, feelings and family wellbeing.

Their relationship is also shaped by what some sociologists call confluent love. Rather than staying together because of duty, religion or pressure from the wider community, Sam and Jordan see their relationship as continuing only while it remains satisfying and emotionally rewarding for both of them. This links to the individualisation thesis, which suggests that people are less guided by tradition and more focused on personal choice and self-development. Relationships today may therefore feel more flexible, but also more fragile.

Both partners are aware that modern family life can be insecure. Several of their friends have experienced divorce, re-partnering or living in stepfamilies, and both Sam and Jordan know people who have had a series of committed relationships across their adult lives. This reflects the idea of serial monogamy, where individuals move through a sequence of exclusive relationships over time rather than remaining in one lifelong marriage. Their awareness of this possibility creates both freedom and uncertainty in their own relationship.

The family still performs important functions. It provides emotional support, companionship, economic cooperation and primary socialisation for the children. However, wider society has altered how these functions are carried out. Schools, social media and youth culture now play a much bigger role in shaping children’s norms and values. The family is also less clearly based around fixed traditional duties and more around negotiation and emotional needs. This links to the idea of the privatised nuclear family, where the home is seen as a more inward-looking emotional unit, but one increasingly shaped by outside pressures.

Their lives are also influenced by wider insecurity. Rising housing costs, uncertain career paths, pressure to maintain incomes and changing expectations around parenting all make family life feel less predictable than it once did. This reflects Beck’s risk society, where individuals must navigate uncertainty and make choices without the clear guidance of traditional norms. Overall, the Harris family highlights how changes in wider society have reshaped the functions of the family: some traditional functions remain, but family life is more negotiated, more individualised and often more insecure than in the past.

Submit Quiz Restart Quiz