Ethics Committee Simulator: Evaluating Research Proposals

Ethical issues matter because sociologists often study people’s private lives, difficult experiences and unequal social positions. Researchers should consider informed consent, so participants know what the research involves; confidentiality and anonymity, so identities are protected; harm and distress, especially when researching sensitive topics such as poverty, racism, care, health or family life; deception, where participants are not fully told what is happening; and vulnerable groups, such as children, young carers, disabled people, migrants or those in insecure work. The British Sociological Association describes its ethical guidance as a longstanding resource for sociologists, and its wider position is that ethical decisions often involve judgement rather than a simple checklist.

Infographic discussing ethical issues in conducting research, including informed consent, deception, privacy, confidentiality and anonymity, and protection from harm.

This Ethics Committee Simulator is designed for Cambridge OCR A Level Sociology students studying Component 02: Researching and understanding social inequalities. OCR expects students to understand practical, ethical and theoretical issues in sociological research, including ethics, access and gatekeeping, and to apply research methods to the context of social inequalities. In this activity, students act as members of a research ethics committee. For each proposal, they must decide whether to approve, amend or reject the study. The feedback explains key ethical issues and helps students practise AO2 application and AO3 evaluation.

Ethics Committee Simulator

Review each research proposal and decide whether to approve, amend or reject it. Use ethical principles to protect participants while still allowing useful sociological research to take place.

Student role: You are a member of a sociology ethics committee. Your decision should balance the value of the research with issues such as consent, confidentiality, harm, deception and vulnerability.
Ethics review panel

Proposal 1 of 9

Research proposal

Topic Method Risk level

Your ethics committee decision

Choose approve, amend or reject to reveal feedback.
Score: 0 / 0

Write your committee justification

Choose one proposal and write 3–4 sentences explaining your decision. Include at least two ethical concepts.

Model justification: I would amend this proposal because the research topic is valuable, but the ethical safeguards are not yet strong enough. The researcher should improve informed consent by explaining the aim of the study, what participation involves and the right to withdraw. They should also protect confidentiality by using pseudonyms and removing identifying details. This allows the research to continue while reducing the risk of harm to participants.

Ethics revision table

Ethical issue What it means Example problem Possible solution
Informed consent Participants understand the research and agree to take part. Participants are not told the real purpose of the study. Use clear information sheets and consent forms.
Confidentiality Participants’ personal information is protected. A workplace study could reveal which employee criticised management. Use pseudonyms, remove details and store data securely.
Harm Research should avoid emotional, social, legal or physical harm. Interviewing young carers about stress could cause distress. Use support information, careful questioning and the right to stop.
Deception Participants are not fully told what the study is about. Covert observation in a workplace. Only use if strongly justified; consider debriefing where possible.
Vulnerable groups Some participants may need extra protection. Children, migrants, disabled people, victims or those dependent on services. Extra consent, safeguarding, accessible materials and careful risk assessment.
Gatekeeping Organisations may control access to participants. A school may allow access only to certain pupils. Negotiate access while checking whether the sample is becoming biased.

You can download a copy of the ethic summary from the link below:

Leave a Reply

Media Boss Battle: Cambridge OCR A Level Sociology MCQ Challenge

The Cambridge OCR Media option in Component 01 treats the media as one of the most powerful agencies of socialisation in contemporary society. While traditional agencies such as the family, education, peer groups and religion still matter, students need to understand that media now shape identity, values and behaviour in everyday life through television, film,…

Youth Subcultures: Boss Battle – Cambridge OCR A Level Sociology MCQ Paper 1

This arcade-style revision quiz is designed for Cambridge OCR A-level Sociology students studying the Youth subcultures option in Component 01. Students enter their initials like an old-school arcade machine, then work through five timed levels covering youth culture, subcultural identity, theoretical explanations of subculture formation, class, gender, ethnicity, hybridity, spectacular youth subcultures, deviant subcultures, gangs,…

The Final Countdown: Cambridge OCR Culture, Socialisation and Identity Boss Battle: MCQ Challenge

This arcade-style revision quiz is designed for Cambridge OCR A-level Sociology students revising the core Culture, Socialisation and Identity section of Component 01. Students enter their initials like an old-school arcade machine, then work through five timed levels covering culture, norms and values, types of culture, socialisation, agencies of socialisation, identity and sociological explanations of…

Leave a Reply

About the author

The Sociology Guy is a pseudonym originally used by Craig Gelling when he was working in an FE College to provide an outlet for his frustrations with how he was expected to teach and strict rules around intellectual property in his former employer. The Sociology Guy name came from his early years as a supply teacher, where students would often not know his name and ask for ‘the sociology guy’ when coming to the staff room. Initially set up in 2018 as an anonymous You Tube channel, Craig has since written, recorded and presented for many different organisations and education providers. His purpose is to try and make sociology both accessible and understandable for all students and support teachers to inspire the next generation of sociologists.

Discover more from The Sociology Guy

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading